There's something peculiarly incongruous about the cultural critics refrain that a persons skin colour dictates how they should be seen by society and the marketplace
, the implication that Hispanics, Blacks, Iranians, etc., are intentionally under-served, marginalised or discriminated against if not catered to as being
"Hispanic", "Black" etc., first and 'individual' or 'person' second. That people can or should only define themselves by arbitrary characteristics over which they have little control, considering themselves 'victims' if not acknowledged by, or as, such.
It is seemingly unthinkable for an Hispanic American to play an FPS in which the 'hero' character is established as being white, the bad guy, brown/black/[colour]. That the gamer simply cannot or should not enjoy the game for the story being told. Good versus Bad. That because the hero is not immediately reflective of the player, it must mean game developers and publishers are implicitly racist, or at the very least subconsciously marginalising whole swathes of people through some inherent "white neo-colonialism
" they didn't know they had as beneficiaries of inheriting an existing system. Its basically, and without the barest hint of irony; everyone except those pointing out the 'problem' are racists.
For this picture of the world to be true however, it requires the individual lack or have no agency, that marginalised groups can only act as a member of a particular ethnicity, can only see themselves, conduct their lives around being [insert 'X' arbitrary characteristic here
]. Its a world view, an individualised ecosystem, that holds people hostage to, or coerces, self-identification as 'X' and only as 'X'. It confines, traps them within the group, belong or else suffer the consequences.
It says Sophia cannot not play Wolfenstein because B.J. Blazkowicz is white (Polish decent). It says she can't step outside her
identity into anothers, that she can't imagine their identity to be hers
for the experience - she's not playing as
B.J., she is
B.J., B.J. is herself
- just as the inter-sectional narrative demands of "white, male, heterosexual
" game developers and publishers and their catering to supposed marginalised demographics. It says Sophia cannot/should not play 'white' games simply because she likes the story, kicking ass and chewing bubblegum. She's a race-traitor if she does. This message having unopposed traction speaks volumes, of the narrative, of the people pushing it, and those supporting it, tacitly or not.Further Reading
- "Just shoot the Aayrabs" or "why can't we play games as terrorists"
- "Muslim blood is cheap" or "why can't we play as terrorists, part II"
- The dark side of diversity: "positive discrimination" (reverse discrimination)