Recent Posts

Repeal the Online Safety Act
We want the Government to repeal the Online Safety act.

More details
We believe that the scope of the Online Safety act is far broader and restrictive than is necessary in a free society.

For instance, the definitions in Part 2 covers online hobby forums, which we think do not have the resource to comply with the act and so are shutting down instead.

We think that Parliament should repeal the act and work towards producing proportionate legislation rather than risking clamping down on civil society talking about trains, football, video games or even hamsters because it can't deal with individual bad faith actors.

100,000 signature were needed for the topic to be considered up for debate in parliament, which it surpassed in 1 day; at time of writing the petition has ~400,000 signatures - what should happen with these is that once they reach the set goal, a date is then set for a discussion of the issue. In this instance this will not happen as the UK government responded to the petition directly saying they have

Quote

...no plans to repeal the Online Safety Act, and is working closely with Ofcom to implement the Act as quickly and effectively as possible to enable UK users to benefit from its protections.

Reading the full response, the government is obligating compliance to "harms" defined by OfCom, the non-governmental organising (a Blairite Quango [quasi-autonomous non-governmental organisation] established in 2003) tasked with policing all content and media in the UK, but its framing seems to obligate compliance in a negative sense. In other words, OfCom isn't directly advising with regards to compliance, they policing for non-compliance (which in theory means just about anyone).

Blog / Re: GamerGate 3 - Steam, Big Banks & Collective Shout: Itch.io Statement

« Last post by kat on July 25, 2025, 03:04:45 PM »

Itch.io, one of the service providers hit by the Collective Shout strong arming has issued a statement - it should be noted in the below that Itch.io do not elaborate on what happened except to say they had to act quickly; there's no mention as to whether Collective Shout contacted them; gave them time to act; confirmation they acted etc., etc., basically any answer the the question posed in the OP;

Quote

Update on NSFW content

We have "deindexed" all adult NSFW content from our browse and search pages. We understand this action is sudden and disruptive, and we are truly sorry for the frustration and confusion caused by this change.

Recently, we came under scrutiny from our payment processors regarding the nature of some content hosted on itch.io. Due to a game titled No Mercy, which was temporarily available on itch.io before being banned back in April, the organization Collective Shout launched a campaign against Steam and itch.io, directing concerns to our payment processors about the nature of certain content found on both platforms.

Our ability to process payments is critical for every creator on our platform. To ensure that we can continue to operate and provide a marketplace for all developers, we must prioritize our relationship with our payment partners and take immediate steps towards compliance.

This is a time critical moment for itch.io. The situation developed rapidly, and we had to act urgently to protect the platform's core payment infrastructure. Unfortunately, this meant it was not realistic to provide creators with advance notice before making this change. We know this is not ideal, and we apologize for the abruptness of this change.

We are currently conducting a comprehensive audit of content to ensure we can meet the requirements of our payment processors. Pages will remain deindexed as we complete our review. Once this review is complete, we will introduce new compliance measures. For NSFW pages, this will include a new step where creators must confirm that their content is allowable under the policies of the respective payment processors linked to their account.

Part of this review will see some pages being permanently removed from itch.io. Affected accounts will be notified via their account's email address from our support address. You can reply to that email if you have any follow up questions.

We ask for your patience and understanding as we navigate this challenging period. I'm sorry we can not share more at this time as we are still getting a full understanding of the situation ourselves. We will post a follow up on our blog if the situation changes.

Thank you.

Blog / UK Online Safety Act is LIVE

« Last post by kat on July 25, 2025, 10:58:34 AM »

The UK's Online Safety Act is now live and in effect. All residents in the UK - minors and adults alike - will now be required to verify their identity to services or websites that provide content that's not specifically for children under the age of 18 (17 years or younger). Depending on the server this may means scanning an 'identity' document that includes a photo or owners image, such as a passport, or by verifying using a 'face scan'. In both (or all) instances, this personally identifying information (PII) is uploaded/sent to the verifying party.

Quote

Important note: this isn't specifically about content that would otherwise be considered 'adult' or "18" or "R" rated, but content the Online Safety Act considers "harmful" or "inappropriate", e.g. "this includes [but is not limited to] taking specific action to prevent children from encountering pornographic content, and content that encourages, promotes or provides instructions for suicide, self-harm and eating disorders." ["How the Online Safety Act will help to protect children"]

In a nutshell, the Online Safety Act places a "legal duty", a "burden of responsibility" to keep children safe, into the hands of third-parties and other entities or people, not the parents or those directly responsible for their general well being. In addition, the upload or sending of identifying documentation to third-party's does not guaranty this process is being serviced through legitimate entity's specifically because of the third party burden - this won't necessarily stop bad actors hijacking this requirement for their own ends, it's astonishing this doesn't appear to have been a consideration, the Government instead relying on bad actors not acting badly ("criminals better not criminal") - in other words, law abiding citizens most affected.

Blog / Re: GamerGate 3 - Steam, Big Banks & Collective Shout

« Last post by kat on July 21, 2025, 04:45:04 PM »

On the question of disproportional success; financials for 2023-24, for an org that 0 full-time employees, 1 part-time, and 15 volunteers (unpaid?) - they work an equivalent to having 2 full-time employees. Full report for 2023/24, notably Collective Shout assert they "(i) provide evidence-based information to the public on the impact of the Company's principle activities". What evidence? And where?

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10