Whilst Value and EA could be blamed for the secondary and after-the-fact poor implementation of the adjusted content, why should they? The game worked perfectly fine before the ABC got their hands on it. So comparing the 'before' and 'after' and then blaming Valve/EA is seriously overstating the obvious; of course the unedited version will be better, it was designed that way. Do they seriously expect Valve and EA to basically rebuild the game so they then have two code trees to bugtrack and patch, just so a 15 rated version works like the R/18?
Yes, we need an overhaul of the system and an R classification, but the focus for this review can’t be the framework that brought about the content, but the content itself. And that content is lacking. This game has been completely compromised and just isn’t that much fun to play.They're finding the game to be craptastic as a direct result of the ABD framework; that is the sole and single reason, so I'm not really sure what point they're actually trying to make at the end of the day, they're certainly trying to avoid 'blaming' the ABC that's for sure. Yellow bellied hacks that they are! ;)